{"id":344,"date":"2004-08-04T11:49:29","date_gmt":"2004-08-04T18:49:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/klishis.com\/notreally\/archives\/344"},"modified":"2004-08-04T11:49:29","modified_gmt":"2004-08-04T18:49:29","slug":"feel-free-to-tell-me-im-wrong","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/klishis.com\/notreally\/archives\/344","title":{"rendered":"Feel Free to Tell Me I&#8217;m Wrong"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Just got an e-mail forward from Andy, which I think he expected to set me off. I&#8217;m pretty sure I gave him a far different response than he expected.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.eff.org\/news\/archives\/2004_06.php#001658\">Online Privacy &#8220;Eviscerated&#8221; by First Circuit Decision<\/a><\/p>\n<p>The First Circuit Court of Appeals dealt a grave blow to the privacy of Internet communications with its decision today in the case of U.S. v. Councilman. The court held that it was not a violation of criminal wiretap laws for the provider of an email service to monitor the content of users&#8217; incoming messages without their consent. The defendant in the case is a seller of rare and used books who offered email service to customers. The defendant had configured the mail processing software so that all incoming email sent from Amazon.com, the defendant&#8217;s competitor, was copied and sent to the defendant&#8217;s mailbox as well as to the intended recipient&#8217;s. As the court itself admitted, &#8220;it may well be that the protections of the Wiretap Act have been eviscerated as technology advances.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> My response to him was thus:<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;ll probably end up at a higher court, but I think the ruling was correct.<\/p>\n<p>Just as a landlord has the right to enter your apartment or house, so, I think, should an e-mail provider retain the right (unless otherwise stated in a privacy policy) to read your e-mail messages. Is this a wise business decision? Hell no! But caveat emptor! It is, I believe, up to the consumer to scope out products they purchase or buy. For these same reasons I have no problem with g-mail. After all, if I don&#8217;t like the service, I can switch to another, that does not violate my privacy.<\/p>\n<p>This makes it far different, I think, from a wiretap run by the government, where you do not have the option switching to another provider with a privacy policy.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>On further reflection, it&#8217;s stupid on other grounds, as it would then, I believe, make the e-mail provider <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sfgate.com\/cgi-bin\/article.cgi?file=\/chronicle\/archive\/2003\/11\/13\/MNGPU30H811.DTL\">legally responsible<\/a> for the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.findarticles.com\/p\/articles\/mi_m0HDN\/is_2000_May_1\/ai_61859564\">content of messages<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>But as usual, feel free to explain to me how I&#8217;m wrong.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Just got an e-mail forward from Andy, which I think he expected to set me off. I&#8217;m pretty sure I gave him a far different response than he expected. Online Privacy &#8220;Eviscerated&#8221; by First Circuit Decision The First Circuit Court of Appeals dealt a grave blow to the privacy of Internet communications with its decision [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-344","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pefxA-5y","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/klishis.com\/notreally\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/344","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/klishis.com\/notreally\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/klishis.com\/notreally\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/klishis.com\/notreally\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/klishis.com\/notreally\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=344"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/klishis.com\/notreally\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/344\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/klishis.com\/notreally\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=344"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/klishis.com\/notreally\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=344"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/klishis.com\/notreally\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=344"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}