Random (but not really)

Wednesday, February 13, 2008

Reviewedededed

I have to say that I am sorely disappointed in Shawn’s review of a review of his review.

penguinShawn’s review review lacked the substance that I’ve come to expect from his commentary, and instead did little more than tell us that a review of his review existed.

When I read a review of a review, I want to know the nitty gritty: what was exceptional about the review–either exceptionally good or exceptionally bad. There wasn’t even any mention of hideous arse candles. I really expect any negative review of a review to contain at least a side reference to them.

And not only was there not a video of this review, but there weren’t even any pictures, displaying the strengths and weaknesses of the review to be reviewed. All we got was a lousy smiley?! UNACCEPTABLE!

This review lacked the wit and charisma that I’ve come to expect from a man who gives his wife five hot water bottles for Valentine’s Day.
Shawn, I expect better of you in the future.


Also: TAKE YOUR BLOOD PRESSURE MEDICINE!

7 Responses to “Reviewedededed”

  1. Shawn Powers Says:

    BWAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAAAA!

    That was great, Michelle. I just read it to my family, and they laughed as well.

  2. Nathan Says:

    Best review of a review of a review of WTF I’ve ever read. And the big giant picture of you cannibal penguin was excellent too.

  3. MWT Says:

    Scintillating … invigorating… a must read!

  4. Janiece Says:

    Ummm…what?

  5. Jeri Says:

    Can I pet the cute little penguin?

  6. Anne C. Says:

    Brilliant, Michelle. Simply brilliant.

  7. Tom Says:

    Count me in, too. I like that you’re kinda cross-posting, and that if I didn’t read blogs I might not know what you are talking about, and that since I do, I enjoy both more!

    And the penguin! The icon-sized one just doesn’t have the same IMPACT! (slap!)

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress

books main pictures cats e-mail