Random (but not really)

Monday, September 19, 2005

Race and Poverty

There have been a lot of people saying that the American response to Katrina was racist (and thus that Bush is racist) because so many African Americans remained in New Orleans, with no way to evacuate, and then were left to suffer without assistance.

Well, as much as I dislike Bush, I don’t think he’s a racist. I just think he doesn’t give a damn about the poor.

But I came across something very interesting in one of the articles I’m reading for my gerontology class. (Culture, Diversity, and Aging) Let me quote:

Black people are more likely not only to live in lower-SES (socioeconomic status) communities than non-Black people but to live in lower socioeconomic communities than non-Black people with the same income level. For example…in metropolitan areas in 1990, only 6.3% of poor white people lived in high poverty areas, compared with 33.5 percent and 22.1 percent of poor Black and poor Hispanic people, respectively.

Robert, S.A. and Lee, K.Y. (2002) Explaining Race Differences in Health among Older Adults: The Contribution of Community Socioeconomic Context. Research on Aging, 24, 654-683.

Maybe we live in a society where there is not as much overt racism as in the past, but we certainly haven’t escaped the legacy of racism.

Written by Michelle at 12:02 pm    

Comments (0)  Permalink

Categories: Politics  

Saturday, September 10, 2005

Habeas Corpus

This came in under the radar.

A federal appeals court yesterday backed the president’s power to indefinitely detain a U.S. citizen captured on U.S. soil without any criminal charges, holding that such authority is vital during wartime to protect the nation from terrorist attacks.

If you aren’t frightened by this, then you aren’t paying attention.

The key is here:

The ruling limits the president’s power to detain Padilla to the duration of hostilities against al Qaeda, but the Bush administration has said that war could go on indefinitely.

The government now has the right to lock you up and throw away the key solely because it says you are a threat.

Remember: Just because you aren’t a threat now, doesn’t mean you won’t be a threat in the future.

Written by Michelle at 11:34 am    

Comments (0)  Permalink

Categories: Politics  

Sunday, September 4, 2005

Oh Crap

Chief Justice Rehnquist has died

Written by Michelle at 8:10 am    

Comments (0)  Permalink

Categories: Politics  

Wednesday, August 17, 2005

Soldiers Lost

1,847 soldiers have died in Iraq since the start of the conflict.

223 soldiers have died in Afghanistan.

Baltimore Sun Rememberence Site

Digital Memorial for those killed in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Please remember our veterans and those who have given their lives, not with ribbon magnets but with benefits for our soldiers, our veterans, and their families.

Written by Michelle at 5:57 pm    

Comments (0)  Permalink

Categories: Politics  

Monday, July 25, 2005

Helmets

Someone–I think it was Mark–was ranting about how Manchin wants to repeal the state helmet law for motorcycles. How there are more important issues for the state to be dealing with, and so on and so forth.

Now, despite the fact that I’m getting my Master’s in Public Health–a department that uniformly wants to extend the existing law to ATVs–I don’t agree with helmet laws. If you’re stupid enough to ride without a helmet, then by all means, please do so and take yourself out of the gene pool.

But, as many point out, such injuries have a public cost, which is the cost of health care for those who suffer traumatic brain injuries. A large burden, especially if the injured party has inadequate health insurance, or lacks health insurance entirely.

So I had a thought.

Let’s repeal the helmet law, but add in a few caveats. First, you’ll have to get a special license plate for your bike if you want to ride without a helmet. That license will cost you an extra, say, $500 a year–money that goes straight into the state Medicaid fund. Second, the list of owners who want the option of riding helmetless is to be made available to all insurance companies. And those insurance companies will be given the right to increase the premiums of those choose to ride helmetless. I think that capping those increases at 300% should be sufficient.

And the fine for riding without a helmet on an unlicensed bike would be something like $1000 and a suspension of your license for a year.

It’s perfect. We’ll help shore up the Medicaid system, and the extra money going to the insurance companies should allows them to decrease rates for everyone else.

It’s a win-win situation!

Now all I have to do is convince the WV legislature.

Written by Michelle at 6:20 pm    

Comments (7)  Permalink

Categories: Politics  

Tuesday, July 5, 2005

Politics, Civic Discourse, and the 4th of July

So, my parents went to protest the President’s speech, and they were not arrested—in fact it doesn’t look like anyone was arrested, which is good. My mom said there was a good turnout, and that three protesters actually got in, turned their backs to Bush when he came in, and then walked out when he started talking. According to her—and to the radio—you could hear the protestors throughout Bush’s speech, which is pretty good, considering that he’s usually described as very isolated from protestors. And from what I heard on the radio, the cheers during his speech were half-hearted at best.

My mom said she knew tons of people there, including Dr I and his wife, and they had a nice time. Someone from the Elkins paper interviewed my dad apparently, but I haven’t seen any papers, so I can’t tell you if they got their pictures in any papers.

This morning on the radio I heard an interview with Charlene Marshall, who said she was disappointed in the speech. Which is pretty polite of her I think. I think when I see Gwen Marshall, I’ll have to ask her if she went with her mom, and what she thought.

I was pleased that WVU chose to allow protestors that close to the President. With all the hooplah over the “Free Speech” areas, I figured that WVU might just arrest anyone protesting on University property, but things went well and there don’t seem to have been any arrests, so I’m pleased.

Next time we see the Campus Cops who work at Health Sciences, we’ll have to ask them their opinion about the whole thing. I’m all but certain that every single WVU Officer was required to work, same for all the city police, sheriff department, and local state police. With all the overtime, I can only imagine what this did to already strained budgets.

I haven’t heard much more about Rove et al pushing Capito into a Senate run, but my Mom said she saw lots of pro-Byrd signs (one of the sings that I put up was BYRD 2006) in addition to anti-Bush signs, so despite the fact that they want to take out Byrd, it looks like he still has plenty of support, at least around here. Which is probably unsurprising, considering all the money Byrd has brought into this area and into this state. While it looks like National Guard units will be moved out of the state despite Bush lauding our Guard and Reserve units during the campaign. Though I figure South Dakota should be even more insulted. They voted in a Republican senator only to lose their base, and one of the biggest employers in the state. Gotta love the loyalty shown to those who supported Bush in the last election.

But really, I was glad to hear that the protest went well, and everything was civil. One of the things that I hate so much about the current political climate is the amount of bile and invective that are thrown about the political stage. Both sides are so polarized that no one is listening to anything the other side is saying, and many times with good reason. One of the many lessons I learned from the BBSes was that the more shrill and hostile you became, the more you were ignored. But actually listening to the other side, and conceding their good points made them more receptive to listening to what you had to say.

Not everyone of course, and not all the time, but I found that when true discussion happened, everyone learned, and everyone had their minds changed about some portion of the subject, even if it was just learning that those on the other side were not all hot head lunatics. And I ended up partaking in a lot of good an interesting discussions, learning a lot, and having my mind changed about any number of subjects. And we managed to talk about all the subjects you’re supposed to avoid: God. Religion. Abortion. Gun control. Sexuality. Free speech. The Death Penalty.

And I eventually learned and understood both sides of the issue, and saw that the arguments on both sides had validity. (In fact I can–and have–argued either side of several of those issues, solely for the sheer joy of debate.)

I really miss those discussions. I love Making Light, but often the discussion there is preaching to the choir. Obsidian Wings is nice, however at times I find the voices on the far left and the far right a little too negative. And too often posts are stated in absolutes, which leaves no room for discussion, for listening to what the other side has to say, and for addressing the problems of the other side.

Unless I am willing to accept that my opponents belief system has validity, then I am not truly willing to engage in debate, and neither side will get anywhere. Which is the point that American politics is rapidly reaching. As long as choruses on both sides shout down opinions they dislike, and brand those with whom they disagree as traitors, we will continue to accomplish nothing.

“I may disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.”

For me the idea of civilized debate has always come down to this. My opponent has a right to speak, and civilized discourse says that as long as both sides are being polite, I owe my opponent the respect of listening to what they are saying, because only then will I be able to convince them of the validity of my own argument.

Written by Michelle at 4:53 pm    

Comments (2)  Permalink

Categories: Politics  

Monday, July 4, 2005

Happy Independence Day

The Declaration of Independence of the Thirteen Colonies
In CONGRESS, July 4, 1776

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. –That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. –Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain [George III] is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us, in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty and perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by the Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.

Written by Michelle at 8:00 am    

Comments (0)  Permalink

Categories: Politics  

Thursday, June 30, 2005

Ick

1) PRESIDENT BUSH TO DELIVER FOURTH OF JULY SPEECH IN MORGANTOWN FROM WOODBURN CIRCLE
President George W. Bush will deliver his Fourth of July message mid-morning Monday on WVU’s Downtown Campus, White House officials confirmed today (June 30). A ticket is required to attend the event and can be obtained free of charge by calling the Greater Morgantown Convention and Visitors Bureau at 292-5081 in Downtown Morgantown. More to come on this event Friday.

Okay, I obviously need to make some yard signs for this occasion. Any suggestions (that won’t get me sent to jail)?

ADDENDUM the First:
Gina: Are you sure you don’t want to go to jail?
Me: Yes.
Gina: Well, I can’t cook, but I could bake you a cake with a file in it!
Me: A Word file?

Written by Michelle at 4:13 pm    

Comments (2)  Permalink

Categories: Politics  

Wednesday, June 29, 2005

Veterans

And if there wasn’t already enough to be enraged about, “VA funding is short $1 billion this year.

That’s right, this country is willing to “support the troops“, but only in so much as it means putting a sticker on the back of the SUV, and not, you know, actually giving them pay raises or increased combat pay or keeping open VA hospitals.

Written by Michelle at 12:47 pm    

Comments (0)  Permalink

Categories: Politics  

Bush

How f@ck!ng stupid does he think we are?

After September the 11th, I made a commitment to the American people. This nation will not wait to be attacked again. We will defend our freedom. We will take the fight to the enemy. Iraq is the latest battlefield in this war.

Just to reiterate:
Iraq was NOT involved in the September 11th plots.
Iraq was NOT a terrorist haven until the US invaded.

Written by Michelle at 8:29 am    

Comments (0)  Permalink

Categories: Politics  

Monday, June 27, 2005

Commandments

I must be particularly slow and dense, because I can’t comprehend how Justice Bryer could vote the way he did on two cases that went in opposite directions.

Tell me that this:

No exact formula can dictate a resolution in fact-intensive cases such as this,” he read. “… The determinative factor here, however, is that 40 years passed in which the monument’s presence, legally speaking, went unchallenged.

doesn’t translate as “We’ve done it this way for a long time, therefore it must be okay.”

Written by Michelle at 6:30 pm    

Comments (0)  Permalink

Categories: Politics  

Friday, June 24, 2005

Remember!

Don’t forget to vote Saturday the 25th on the bond issue.

ADDENDUM the First:
Disappointing.

Unsurprising, but disappointing never the less. How we expect to pay our bills in the future is beyond me, but then my fellow state residents have already shown themselves more than willing to vote against their self interest, as is evidenced by the last presidential eletion.

And as coal companies continue to dump their pension plans, state finances are not going to get better, as those who spend their lives working are now left with no retirement, and are going to require more and more support by the state. (You think are Medicaid bills are bad NOW…)

I just don’t understand how people can be so short-sighted.

Written by Michelle at 4:13 pm    

Comments (0)  Permalink

Categories: Politics  

Downer

Another case of mad cow in the US. Reassuring words from the government.

This animal was blocked from entering the food supply because of the firewalls we have in place. Americans have every reason to continue to be confident in the safety of our beef,” he (Agriculture Secretary Mike Johanns ) said.

However…

The animal was a “downer,” meaning it was unable to walk. Such animals are banned from the food supply.

What is unsaid here is that only downers are pulled from the food supply. Only cows that are visibly ill are tested.

Which means that if a cow is not visibly ill, it enters the food supply. It becomes burgers and steaks for humans, while the more “non-traditional” parts are rendered into animal food.

And people wonder why I don’t eat mammals…

Written by Michelle at 4:03 pm    

Comments (0)  Permalink

Categories: Politics  

Monday, May 30, 2005

Memorial Day

gpopbumpa.jpgToday is Memorial Day.

This is the day we are to remember those who fought for our country. This is the day we remember those who fought for our freedom and for justice. This is the day we remember those who gave their lives to so that we might now have:

freedom of speech….
freedom of religion….
freedom of association….
freedom of the press….
the right to keep and bear arms….
the right to keep the military out of our homes….
the right to be secure from illegal search and seizure….
the right to a trial by jury….

Main Entry: freedom
Pronunciation: ‘frE-d&m
Function: noun
1 : the quality or state of being free: as
a: the absence of necessity, coercion, or constraint in choice or action
b: liberation from slavery or restraint or from the power of another : INDEPENDENCE
c: the quality or state of being exempt or released usually from something onerous (freedom from care)

The absence of coercion. Liberation from slavery or restraint. The state of being released from something onerous.

Memorial Day
The history of Memorial Day
US Census site for memorial day
Remember
The Constitution and other historical US documents

Written by Michelle at 8:00 am    

Comments (0)  Permalink

Categories: Politics  
« Previous PageNext Page »

Powered by WordPress