Random (but not really)

Wednesday, April 8, 2009

Mythology

Two quotes from Karen Armstrong’s A Short History of Myth, which I finished reading last week. (The link is to my review.)

Today the word ‘myth’ is often used to describe something that is not true… Since the eighteenth century, we have developed a scientific view of history; we are concerned above all with what actually happened. But in the pre-modern world, when people wrote about the past they were more concerned with what the event had meant.

A myth does not impart factual information, but is primarily a guide to behavior. It’s truth will be revealed only if it is put into practice–ritually or ethically. If it is pursued as if it were a purely intellectual hypothesis, it becomes remote and incredible.

If you wish, discuss.

Written by Michelle at 8:00 am    

Comments (19)  Permalink

Categories: Religion & Philosophy  

Monday, March 9, 2009

13 Adar

Happy Purim!

Written by Michelle at 7:20 pm    

Comments (5)  Permalink

Categories: Holidays,Religion & Philosophy  

Saturday, March 7, 2009

Agape

As I was listening to the radio Friday morning while getting ready for work, they played a segment on the plans Obama has for changes to the tax system, and I was struck by one idea mentioned several times by the Republicans: if we change the tax breaks for charitable giving, then people will give less to charity, which would be terrible at this time, while more and more people are relying upon charity.

I immediately thought, are you kidding me?!

Do the Republicans really believe that the only reason people make charitable donations is for the tax breaks?

If that’s true, it explains an awful lot about what’s wrong with the Republican party.

Let me make this clear, I make charitable donations–in fact Michael and I donated two cars to Good News Mountaineer Garage (last when we bought our new car in 2003).

I make donations every paycheck to local United Way groups (I always give money to the RDVIC, Christian Help, and one other group that often changes from year to year.

We make regular donations of clothing and items to either Christian Help or Goodwill (if I can’t make the hours for Christian Help), and I’m always amazed by the people who insist on getting a receipt for their single measly bag of used clothing (they set the dollar amount of the donation).

And we have never once claimed a charitable donation on our taxes.

I don’t do these things because I expect to be rewarded for my actions or donations.

I do these things because it is the right thing to do.

Apparently some Republicans don’t quite get that idea.

Thursday, February 26, 2009

100% Heathen

Your morality is 0% in line with that of the bible.

 

Damn you heathen! Your book learnin’ has done warped your mind. You shall not be invited next time I sacrifice a goat.

Do You Have Biblical Morals?
Take More Quizzes

That’s right. I’m 100% heathen and proud of it!

(via Jim)

Written by Michelle at 8:01 am    

Comments (8)  Permalink

Categories: Non-Sequiturs,Religion & Philosophy  

Monday, January 19, 2009

Martin Luther King Jr


Let us develop a kind of dangerous unselfishness. One day a man came to Jesus, and he wanted to raise some questions about some vital matters of life. At points he wanted to trick Jesus, and show him that he knew a little more than Jesus knew and throw him off base….
(more…)

Wednesday, November 19, 2008

Kosher

So a post over at Eric‘s has inadvertently lead to my consideration of a very strange question.

Initial question was if crosses and holy water are effective against vampires, would vampires be safer if they moved to India or the Middle East?

But the question that came from that is whether a Jewish vampire who drank human blood would be keeping kosher.

Here are my arguments supporting the thesis they would be.

1. I believe that in a life or death situation, a Jew is allowed to eat non-kosher foods to save his own life. If a vampire could survive only upon blood, shouldn’t the drinking of human blood be okay as long as the victim was not killed or maimed? (i.e. if the vampire was polite and asked nicely beforehand.)

2. Isn’t there a difference between drained blood and blood straight from the source, so to speak?

3. Would kosher rules even apply to vampires? A vampire has died an moved on from human life. Do the rules of Leviticus even apply to the undead, assuming they still retain free will?

Anyway, just some thoughts filtering through my brain.

Written by Michelle at 8:00 am    

Comments (4)  Permalink

Categories: Non-Sequiturs,Religion & Philosophy  

Saturday, November 1, 2008

Dia de los Muertos

Now that I’m properly medicated, I think I can write a better Dia de los Muertos post.

I think the US has a strange and somewhat unhealthy attitude towards death. As S frequently notes, we don’t even call it death, but refer to it with a variety of bizarre euphemisms.

Death is an inevitable part of life, and for good reasons. As humans, we have reproduced at such a rate that food production and land resources in many areas are not able to match growth rates. And our systems of governance are such that we don’t like to share our bounty when we have it.

That is not to say that death is not painful for the living. Loss is both inevitable and painful. But it is a part of life.

I often wonder if we have become too separated from death. Although the hospice movement is attempting to change this, death has become medicalized. It is something that occurs in sterile hospital environments with beeping machines and bright white lights. Not only is this unpleasant for the individual who is dying, but it makes the process of dying alien for those who survive.

That doesn’t mean I think death should be an everyday affair of no note. In the US we are lucky to have progressed beyond the point where many children died in infancy, and life was often short and brutal. No, we have moved beyond that, and this is a wonderful thing. But in our quest to conquer illness, we have made death a stranger–something to be combated, rather than an inevitable end to a life well lived.

And that is what we should focus upon: the life well lived.

Funerals should be a celebration of a person’s life. They should be a time for remembering joy and happiness. They should be a time for telling stories and sharing who the person was and what they meant to the teller.

I lost two people this year. My grandmother, Harriet Elizabeth, called Beth. And my cousins’ grandmother, Doris.

I was not close to my grandmother, which is a regret, and not what I want to focus on. What I do know is she loved football, especially watching the Washington Redskins. If our visit was on a Sunday in the fall, she’d be ensconced in her chair in the living room, pack of cigarettes beside her, cheering on the Redskins. Perhaps in some small part, my love of football (even if I don’t like the Redskins) came from her.

Doris, my cousins’ grandmother, had a stroke soon after my cousin Liz was born, and changed from the vibrant, outgoing woman of my childhood to a woman afraid to leave the house, even for her grandchildren’s celebrations. My favorite memories of her were at my aunt and uncle’s little farm outside Hancock PA. Celebrations there were always fun and joyous, whether it was a birthday or Thanksgiving. She was a joyful and loving woman, and I hope that in some small way I learned some humor and caring from her.

One last thought. My grandfather, Popbo, died days before my 5th birthday. My memories of him are few, but all are joyful. Even when he was in the hospital, he’d send the cookies from his dinner out to me. (Visiting rules were different I suppose, and so my memories of him in the hospital were of sitting in the car while my grandmother and dad would go into the hospital and visit.)

May you remember your loved ones on this day, with joy and happiness.

Written by Michelle at 5:53 pm    

Comments (4)  Permalink

Categories: Religion & Philosophy,Science, Health & Nature  

Thursday, October 23, 2008

(sigh)

Like everyone else, I get the occasional e-mail missives that I suspect are sent simply to tweak me.

Here is the latest. (with the ridiculous fonts and colors and sizes removed for your sanity.)

REFUSE NEW COINS

This simple action will make a strong statement.

Please help do this.. Refuse to accept these when they are handed to you..

U.S.Government to Release New Dollar Coins

You guessed it
‘IN GOD WE TRUST’ IS GONE!!!
If ever there was a reason to boycott something, THIS IS IT!!!!

DO NOT ACCEPT THE NEW DOLLAR COINS AS CHANGE

Together we can force them out of circulation.

My response is simple: Redde Caesari quae sunt Caesaris et quae sunt Dei, Deo.

Tuesday, October 21, 2008

It’s Our Job to Help the Guy Try to Do Better in Life

If you don’t read John Scalzi’s blog, you may have missed this news story.

No matter how hard I try, I’ll never be a good person, at least in comparison to the likes of Leroy C. McLaughlin. But for all I’ll never achieve that level of goodness, he still inspires me to try.

Written by Michelle at 8:03 pm    

Comments (0)  Permalink

Categories: Politics,Religion & Philosophy  

Monday, September 22, 2008

Fair Trade Shopping

While we were in Wyoming, I discovered that the 28 degree morning temperatures really required a scarf to keep me warm, and I had neglected to bring a scarf (Gloves, yes. Hat, yes. Scarf, no.) So we ended up wandering around Jackson looking for a scarf.

I wanted to spend my money at a local business, but figured I’d end up taking what I could get, since Jackson is very much a tourist trap. Not only did I find a local business, but I found an organic and fair trade scarf there!

Although Whyoming Outfitters where I bought the scarf does not seem to be on line, the company that made the scarf is: Indigenous Fair trade + Organic. I figure that as someone with disposable income, I really should support fair trade and organic products whenever possible, and the higher prices reflect the true costs of the products as opposed to the prices at chains and superstores that are subsidized or bought at the price of paying employees a living wage.

Do I do this all the time? Of course not. I have a minimal amount of disposable income, I’m not rich. But it’s nice to know that when I am able to make those choices, there are companies that allow me to do so.

Written by Michelle at 8:00 am    

Comments (0)  Permalink

Categories: Non-Sequiturs,Religion & Philosophy  

Thursday, September 18, 2008

DINOSAURS!

Invisible Coconuts
If you are confused, see here and here.

Wednesday, September 10, 2008

Let’s Take a Tour… Part I: Writing

So those of you who don’t read this by RSS feed have seen how I’ve personalized Word Press, but believe it or not, there is more to this site than my blog.

Really!

I’ve maintained a personal website since 1998. Initially on Labyrinth, then on Earthlink, and then on various web hosting services. I started my weblog in February of 2002.

Why yes, I did all the coding my hand, thank you. All my web design was done in Arachnophilia, which was a code editor. So no permalinks or anything like that in the early years.

If you go back, what you’ll discover is that since I was writing for myself and sometimes erin (hi erin!), I wrote whatever came to mind. In essence it was to replace the paper journals that I was never capable of keeping up.

Obviously it worked in that I’ve been at this for over six years, but somewhere along the way I seem to have lost that sense of fearlessness about my writing I had then. For example, I can’t remember the last time I wrote about religion, and my posts about politics are few and far between.

Still, that’s a lot of words I’ve written.

I also have a section of writing in general, that contains links to short stories that came from my dreams (I have exceedingly weird dreams, and I sometimes used them as a writing exercise in coherency), and a couple of papers I wrote for school. Those were actually fun. There’s something about a good research paper…

Er… never mind.

OK. So, this somehow ended up being all about the blog anyway. Fine. Tomorrow then.

Monday, August 25, 2008

Politics, Clinton, and the Democratic Party

Here is something I will never understand…

Well, let’s take this back a bit first.

I’m a Democrat with a big D. Have been most of my life, although I admit to Libertarian tendencies. But the why is what I want to address here for a moment. I’m a Democrat because the Democratic party is the major party that aligns most with what I believe and hold to be most important.

First and foremost I believe it is my responsibility to care for others. That means it is our responsibility as a country to care for those in need, regardless of who they are. To me, that means providing health health care to those who can’t afford it. It means providing a safety net to keep children and other at risk individuals from slipping through the cracks. It means providing a living wage for all workers. It means providing a quality education for all children, not just the children of the rich who can afford private school. It means preserving our forests and our wildlife for future generations, not just because so future generations can see trees and animals, but because I believe that biodiversity will be critical to the survival of our species. It means protecting the environment, not just for ourselves and our future generations, but for the entire world.

It means that it is our responsibility for look out for those who are most vulnerable, and if that means that some people game the system and take advantage, so be it. We cannot allow the actions of a handful individuals to become an excuse not to care for those in need.

And I believe that the policies of the Democrats are most in-line with these strongly held personal beliefs.

(Don’t even talk to me about the Green Party or any other “third” party. The US is a two party system. That’s the way it is. In order to affect change, at least for now, we have to work within the system. I won’t waste my vote on a third party candidate unless I am opposed to both candidates.)

So where am I going with this?

Where I am going is my disbelief at the rabid Hillary “supporters” who say they refuse to vote for Barak Obama.

Did they not listen to a word she said during her campaign?

Hillary Clinton and Barak Obama hold many similar beliefs, and the differences between them are minimal compared to the difference between them and John McCain. If they truly believed as she did, if they truly felt that her beliefs were their beliefs, then there is no way they could vote for John McCain.

John McCain does not stand for the things that Hillary Clinton finds important. And so to claim that one would prefer to vote for McCain over Obama means to me that these individuals never truly listed to a single word she said. It means they saw her as the flavor of the month and wanted to jump on her bandwagon, but never understood in the slightest what was important to her and what is important to the Democratic Party.

No, I was not a Clinton supporter. I have been saying for years that she has too many liabilities to be elected. But if she had won the primary, you can be damned sure I would have rallied behind her.

Because what is truly important is the system of beliefs for which she stands, and that they match the system of beliefs for which I stand.

Written by Michelle at 8:58 pm    

Comments (10)  Permalink

Categories: Politics,Religion & Philosophy  

Thursday, August 14, 2008

Hello!

hello
1883, alt. of hallo (1840), itself an alt. of holla, hollo, a shout to attract attention, first recorded 1588. Perhaps from holla! “stop, cease.” Popularity as a greeting coincides with use of the telephone, where it won out over Alexander Graham Bell’s suggestion, ahoy. Central telephone exchange operators were known as hello-girls (1889).

“Hello, formerly an Americanism, is now nearly as common as hullo in Britain (Say who you are; do not just say ‘hello’ is the warning given in our telephone directories) and the Englishman cannot be expected to give up the right to say hello if he likes it better than his native hullo. [H.W. Fowler, “A Dictionary of Modern English Usage,” 1926]

Why am I sharing this?

Because Shawn somehow managed to remind me of this:

‘Heaveno’ has received one heck of a response

KINGSVILLE, Texas (AP) – A South Texas man who campaigned to replace ”hello” with ”heaveno” has had plenty of opportunities to use his new greeting.

Kingsville resident Leonso Canales Jr. has been inundated with telephone calls since he successfully lobbied Kleberg County commissioners last month to designate ”heaveno” as the county’s official greeting.

Still, Matthews said, he wants recognition as a pioneer in taking ”hell” out of ”hello.”

Which led to the discovery of this.

Which lead to this comment by Shawn:

I’m like, “I already read this, HeavenO…”

Written by Michelle at 2:37 pm    

Comments (9)  Permalink

Categories: Non-Sequiturs,Religion & Philosophy  
« Previous PageNext Page »

Powered by WordPress