books

Teresa / Tracy Grant

Books

Charles & Melanie Fraser / Malcom & Suzanne Rannoch

Publication Order: Secrets of a Lady (2002), Beneath a Silent Moon (2003), The Mask of Night (2011), The Paris Affair (2013), The Paris Plot (2014), The Berkeley Square Affair (2014), London Interlude (2015), The Mayfair Affair (2015), Incident in Berkeley Square (2015), London Gambit (2016)

Chronological Order: London Interlude (1814), The Paris Affair (1815), The Paris Plot (1816), Beneath a Silent Moon (1817), The Berkeley Square Affair (1817), The Mayfair Affair (1818), Incident in Berkeley Square (1818), London Gambit (1818)

Rewritten: Secrets of a Lady (1819), The Mask of Night (1820)

The Lescaut Quartet: Dark Angel (1994), Shores of Desire (1997), Shadows of the Heart (1996), Rightfully His (1998)

 

 

Charles & Melanie Fraser / Malcom & Suzanne Rannoch

 

Secrets of a Lady (2002)Secrets-of-a-Lady

Set in London in November 1819

This is the first book in the Malcolm and Susanne Rannoch (Charles & Melanie Fraser) series, but is set in a time after almost all the other books.

Because I’ve read a lot of the other books in this series already, I know a lot of the big surprises/reveals in the story, but it really didn’t matter, because the story was good, and I didn’t know how the secrets would be revealed.

Mélanie Fraser is a devoted wife to Charles and mother to Colin and Jessica, but beneath that perfect exterior lies a tremendous secret that could destroy her life–Melanie was a French spy during the war, while Charles was a British attache who did a deal of spying during the war himself.

Something of importance to note: bad things happen to a child in this story. It’s actually the reason I held off reading this book for so long, because books set later in time refer to this incident, but although it IS horrible, it’s not as horrifying as I feared.

I recommend this book, but I’ll admit I’ve enjoyed the other books in this series more.
Rating: 8/10

Published by HarperCollins

Beneath a Silent Moon (2003)

Set in London, 1817.

Beneath-a-Silent-MoonThis series is somewhat confusing, as the author has published it under two different names (Tracy Grant / Teresa Grant) and the main characters have two different names (Charles & Melanie Fraser / Malcom & Suzanne Rannoch).

It is, however, the same series.

Additionally, the books were written and published NOT in chronological order, so tidbits that appear briefly may have been / might be developed in another book.

That said, you don’t have to read the books in any order (which is good, because I’ve been reading them as they’ve gone on same, which is about as random a reading order as you can get).

In this book, taking place primarily in 1817, Charles & Melanie are in London, Charles’ home, when Charles’ father drops a shocking surprise on family and friends. Then Charles & Melanie receive another unpleasant surprise when they meet with someone who they they sometimes worked with on the Continent during the war.

Then they travel to Charles’ home, and things unravel further.

If you think that in the old days people were prim and proper and well-behaved, you’re in for a surprise. Secret after secret is uncovered.

“The passage was built in the sixteenth century,” he added a moment later. His voice sounded bizarrely normal, especially in contrast to the erratic breathing that underlay it

“To smuggle priests in and out of the house?”

“In this family? Hardly. It connects to the lodge. The lord of the manor at the time was having an affair with the steward’s wife.”

There are also plenty of reminders that there were few love matches in British society.

She and Charles had knit themselves together in this small person in her arms. How odd that one could take a man into one’s body and create a new life with him and yet wonder if one really knew him in the ways that mattered.

It’s also an incredibly complex mystery, with two different threads tangled together.

I quite enjoy this series, even if I have to bookmark passages/pages to come back to later to sort out who’s who (and who is sleeping with whom).
Rating: 8.5/10

Published by NYLA

The Mask of Night (2011)

Set in 1820.The-Mask-of-Night

Again, a reminder that this is a somewhat confusing series to read, as the publication order and chronological order are not related.

The main portion of this book is set in 1820, but there are flashbacks going back to 1809, which provide bits and pieces of the back-story.

We get continuing cast of many of the characters I’ve come to appreciate:

Simon strode back into the center of the library. “Look, Charles, your story’s a coherent scenario. As a dramatist, I appreciate the narrative construction. But as one of the principals, I feel compelled to point out that it contains barely a shred of truth.

And as with the previous mysteries, things are convoluted and complex ans many different plots are hatched by many different people.

“I thought you and Mélanie might think I’d arranged the whole thing to cover my own complicity.”

“We did wonder.”

“I’d have been disappointed in you both if you hadn’t. Has it occurred to you that that might still be the case?”

“That you set all this up and are sitting here nursing me in the dark to win my trust for some nefarious purpose? If you’re that devious, I haven’t a hope in hell of keeping up with you.”

It takes awhile to sort everything out, and the amount of conniving and scheming and nefarious dealings are startling, but not particularly unexpected for that time. (Consider that dotted throughout the story, are historical facts.)

I’m really enjoying this series, and I like that I can read the books in any order.
Rating: 8.5/10

Published by NYLA

The Paris Affair (2013) Paris-Affair

Set in Paris in 1815.

Malcom & Suzanne Rannoch are in Paris in Paris, following the Battle of Waterloo. They are supposed to meet with a French informant who wants out of Paris, and is willing to blackmail multiple members of the British diplomatic corps in his effort to leave. He also gives Malcolm a bit of intelligence to spur him on as well–his half-sister may have had a child.

First, the Dramatis Personae was invaluable, because there are a LOT of characters, and many of them are related to each other, through complex histories of marriages and re-marraiges and bastard children. Really complex. It took me a long time to get the characters straight, and even towards the end there were a couple people who I couldn’t keep straight.

However.

This isn’t necessarily a flaw in the story. Marriages and re-marriages and illegitimate children were complicated, and the British aristocracy was just plain complicated with people having names and titles and referring to each other interchangeably with each. For example, Robert Stewart, Viscount Castlereagh is called Stewart, Castlereagh and Robert by different people, depending upon his relationship with those people.

That’s simply part and parcel of reading historicals. (The British aren’t the only ones who did this, either.)

So the ability to jump back and forth between the Dramatis Personae and the story was a huge help. And the fact that I can bring up a bookmarked page within the page of the ebook I’m reading is even better, but that’s my personal preference.

Additionally, the mystery was really complex and complicated, although in a way that was perfectly appropriate to the time period. (Women regularly went away to hide pregnancies, and there was no DNA testing to prove paternity.) I found the twists and turns very enjoyable.

That isn’t to say that there weren’t occasional problems.

Take these passages, that occurred within a few paragraphs of each other:

“Our nurse hid me before she was killed.

He tracked down my nurse to see that she was all right and learned from her that I’d survived.”

So… was the nurse killed? Or did she live to tell where he had been hidden?

But there were plenty of other passages I thoroughly enjoyed.

“You must be thinking what I’m thinking.”

Paul lifted his brows. “Romantic as the idea of two minds being in tune is, I haven’t the least idea what you’re talking about.

Never mind the Pinky & the Brain voices I heard when I read that.

I’d also like to note that the cover is absolutely gorgeous. Stunningly beautiful AND although there is a feeling of intrigue and danger, the woman on the cover looks neither scared nor meek. Lovely.

All-in-all, it was a fun and engrossing story.
Rating: 7/10

Published by Kensington Books

The Paris Plot (2014)

Set in Paris in 1816.

The-Paris-PlotI actually read this back in August, but had forgotten to review it.

Set in Paris, in 1816, this novella finds Malcolm and Suzanne Rannoch awaiting the birth of their second child. However, events from the past have come back to haunt them, when a thrown rock with the note “You’ll pay for your crimes” is thrown a Suzanne as they are alighting from a carriage.

The problem is that each member of the household assumes the note and rock were directed at them.

Although only a novella, I quite enjoyed checking in with the charaters I first met in The Paris Affair. I have yet to figure out how I’m going to read more books in this series, as they weren’t written in chronological order.
Rating: 7/10

Published by Kensington

The Berkeley Square Affair (2014)

the-berkeley-square-affairSet in London in 1817.

Interestingly, this is a re-writing of her first book, Secrets of a Lady, so I was slightly confused for awhile, until I realized what was going on.

I actually like this better than the original book, partially because she didn’t take the “easy” way of having a child in jeopardy to bring the main characters back together after secrets were exposed.

And there is quite a bit of awfulness.

“(T)that applies to your father as well.”

“Perhaps. Save that I long since came to terms with the fact that Alistair didn’t love me.”

“You can’t know— I mean at times everyone thinks their parents—”

“Quite. Save that in my case Alistair admitted it flat out.” Crispin stared at him.

The relationships between members of the nobility were also somewhat horrifying.

I told him I’d been Alistair’s mistress first, so even though I thought exclusive rights were something claimed by colonial powers, not mature adults, if he was going to get in a huff about betrayal he’d have to get in line behind Alistair and my husband, to name only two with a prior claim.” She took a sip of whisky and coffee. “I’m afraid that didn’t improve the situation.”

Though in so many ways, that makes sense, since these were arranged marriages from which there was no divorce.

The mystery was better than in the original version, and the characters were (of course) more developed, since they’ve had several books to grow their relationships.

I also found the start of the mystery–a lost early version of Hamlet quite interesting as well.
Rating: 8/10

Published by Kensington Books

London Interlude (2015)

London-InterludeSet in London in June 1814.

This is a very short story. 77 pages according to Amazon. So just be aware of what you are getting.

This is the 8th book in the series, but set towards the very beginning of the overarching story, and probably a good introduction to the characters, if you are not familiar with them.

Susanne and Malcolm are visiting London for for the first time as a married couple, and Susanne meets many characters we’ve seen throughout the series, for the first time.

We also briefly meet Alistair, Malcom’s father, who was just as icky as you’d think he was.

But it is a very brief story.
Rating: 7/10

Published by NYLA

The Mayfair Affair (2015)

the-mayfair-affairSet in London in 1818.

Malcolm and Susanne Rannoch have had a difficult three months, after Malcolm finally learns that Susanne had been a French agent. But when their governess is accused of murder–found on the scene in fact, they hope the tenuous peace between them won’t be shattered by their investigation into what really happened to Duke Trenchard.

First and foremost, there was one anachronistic phrase in the book that irritated the crap out of me, mostly because I know the history and find the phrase itself incredibly irritating.

Half of an investigation is asking questions outside the box.

That phrase dates back only to the 1970s, and is entirely overused. So that bugged me to see the phrase there.

Otherwise, is was another enjoyable historical mystery. Although, as always I’m reminded how glad I am to live in the future.

It’s damnably difficult for a woman to get out of a bad marriage. Money and family help, but even with a legal separation, she’d be likely to lose custody of her children. I find the thought intolerable in general.

Yes, there are still plenty of problems, but I am so glad I don’t live in the society of 200 years ago.

(Y)ou can’t undo a move once it’s made. All you can do is look at where you are on the board and make the best move possible given your past choices.

Be aware if you are starting this series, that the publication order is not the timeline order, and that the main characters change names depending upon the publisher and/or whether she is writing as Tracy or Theresa Grant.
Rating: 8/10

Published by NYLA

Incident in Berkeley Square (2015)

Incident-in-Berkeley-SquareSet in London in April 1818

The latest Malcolm & Suzanne Rannoch short story takes place after the events of The Mayfair Affair. Malcolm and Suzanne are hosting a party–an event to help introduce Laura (their former governess) into society, when Raoul and two other spies take refuge in their library.

This is a short story, so it is a small intrigue that is the mystery, but it was still fun to see how the characters deal with the unexpected–and with each other.

“If I imply you’re nursing her that will be sure to deflect questions. Amazing how squeamish that can make some people—including many of the gentlemen who don’t think twice about looking down one’s bodice when one isn’t feeding a baby.”

I will admit that an anachronism in this book started me off on a long discussion with Michael about how hard it would be to develop a program that highlights words that came into use after the book was set. Mostly because this is the second time this author has done it to me, this time with the word introvert, which is most definitely a 20th century word.

It seems to me that someone should be able to develop this.
Rating: 7.5/10

Published by NYLA

London Gambit (2016)

londongambitSet in London June 1818

In the Malcolm & Suzanne Rannoch timeline, this book does not go back into the past, but continues to follow events after the short story Incident in Berkeley Square.

Teddy Craven, David’s oldest nephew and ward, has fled Harrow, because he can no longer handle the teasing after his parents’ deaths, but when he sneaks into his father’s warehouse in London, he discovers a body, and Malcolm is called out by Jeremy Roth to help investigate (and help with Teddy).

Susanne is called out because Bertrand has an injured man who he had helped to flee France, and wants Susanne’s help in settling him in.

We also get to see David and Simon becoming parents of David’s wards.

“If we’d woken up sooner we could have helped,” George said.

“And I have no doubt you would have,” Simon said. “But in some ways perhaps it’s as well the man got out the window. I’m not sure we have enough rope in the house to have tied him up.”

Amy frowned in consideration. “We would have used the window cords.”

And how they are working out their relationship in light of these momentous changes

Lady Clare as good as told me—” He bit the words back. It was too much, even to share with Simon.

“What?” Simon asked.

David looked up and tossed down the last of his brandy. “She implied that she knew about us. And that she’d be quite comfortable with our continuing our relationship while she lived as Lady Worsley and had my children.”

The conversation, and Lady Clare’s complete composure in making her offer, had shocked him, but Simon nodded. “I’m not surprised. She looks a hardheaded young woman, she’s been out for a few seasons, and she wants a husband. God knows there are worse compromises made on the marriage mart every day.”

“Good God, Simon.”

“I’m not saying I advocate it, but I can understand her making the suggestion.

One of the things I find fascinating about this series is how we see the everyday life that surrounds the lives of these spies.

“Sometimes I wonder what Harry sees in me.”

“Cordy, you can’t be serious.”

Drusilla and Jessica were tugging a doll between them. “Share,” Cordelia said.

Suzanne got up to put another doll in Jessica’s hand. When she returned to the sofa, Cordelia had pulled the cherry-colored gauze of her scarf close about her.

The book ends with a huge (but not especially unexpected) change in the lives of the characters. It’ll be interesting to see where this goes.
Rating: 8/10

Published NYLA

 

Mystery / Romance

 

The Lescaut Quartet

 

Dark Angel (1994)

Dark-AngelSet in Spain & London in 1813

Adam Durward is the son of a English father and an Indian mother, and as such has never felt comfortable anywhere, but does have the ability to blend in throughout Europe as needed, which serves him well as a spy.

Caroline is a spoiled and irritating woman who turned down Adam for a safer and more conventional marriage to the more wealthy Jared Rawley. When Jared is accused of treason–by Adam–Caroline goes to Adam to beg him stop.

I like Adam, who has had a hard and complicated life.

“How can you laugh about it?” Caroline demanded. “How can I do anything else?” Adam said.

But I think I prefer Emily (four) two either of the two grownups.

Emily, who had sat by quietly, tugged at Caroline’s sleeve. “How did Adam’s blood get mixed?” she whispered.

“Elena’s going to make me look like a lady,” Emily said. “Then we can play marbles.”

Caroline’s redeeming quality is that she will bend heaven and earth for her daughter. I’ll cut her a lot of slack for that.

Interestingly, I quite liked the secondary romance, between Hawkins and his love–it was complicated, but for very good reasons.

What was good about this story was the mystery. Every time a new discovery is made, it makes the mystery even more complicated, even when you consider cui bono.

Interestingly, this story reminded me very much of the Diana Gabaldon novella “Lord John and the Haunted Soldier” which also deals with exploding cannon. The period between the American revolution and Napoleon’s final defeat was a fascinating one, full of intrigue (and also lots of records, which authors can plumb to make their stories even more realistic). Pretty fascinating stuff–at least to me.

So, a pretty good mystery, despite some of the characters being irritating.
Rating: 7/10

Published by NYLA

Shores of Desire (1997)

Shores-of-DesireSet in Scotland and France in 1815.

This is a boinking book, but it is also a marvelous historical mystery.

Robert Melton and his son are traveling to Scotland to try to discover why his wife was murdered. Because he is a French spy, he is traveling under a false name and not telling the truth about why he is searching for information on Lucie.

Emma Blair is a widow with a young daughter who is managing her family’s household and trying to keep the feud between her family and her neighbors from blowing up into a war.

I really enjoyed the mystery here, as well as the background of the war between England and France. I especially like the look at how the French about the war and about Napoleon. The French revolution was conflicting for who wanted a revolution like the United States had, but instead got the guillotine and blood in the streets.

I quite liked Robert, who (despite being a spy) is quite honorable.

While I’m not a paragon of virtue, that’s one place I draw the line.

“Seducing governesses?”

“Seducing any woman whose livelihood is dependent upon her respectability.”

He also believes deeply in what the French Revolution was supposed be, which is problematic.

I also very much liked Emma, who is attempting to deal with the death of her husband, and the issues they had that were never resolved by his death.

She had never been able to believe that God had a plan for allocating loss and pain. It was easier to blame men’s penchant for making war. How else to account for the randomness of death?

Another thing I particularly liked about this story was that the main characters were a widow and widower who had children–they were both grownups who knew what they wanted. And it made the romance far more realistic.

But as I said, I especially liked the mystery, and the difficulty it caused between the hero and heroine.
Rating: 9/10

Published by NYLA

Re-Read: January 2016

Set in Midlothian, Scotland, March 1815

This is a re-read of an historical mystery/romance, because I wasn’t sure what I was in the mood to read, but most of what is at the top of my to-be-read list is books I can’t read during the week, because I’ll stay up too late reading.

Emma Blair is a widow who is the titular head of the house–a house that has a feud with their neighbors that is threatening to blow out of control.

“Don’t worry, Em. Leave it to the men.” The door closed behind him.

Emma looked at Arabel. “I can’t imagine any words that would make me feel less confident.”

Robert Lescaut is a French colonel and spy who is searching for the man who murdered his wife–a woman who was from Scotland. He believes that she was murdered by someone from the Blair family, but doesn’t know anything for certain.

“She was frightened of nothing and no one. Not brave, I think, as much as foolhardy.”

These are really delightful stories. They’re as much romance as anything, but the mysteries are very interesting, and then historical details and wonderful.

“(W)e’re expecting Jamie and Will. They’re supposed to come into town for the Duchess of Richmond’s ball this evening. Though if the army are about to march—”

“Oh, canceling the ball is the last thing Wellington would want to do,” Caroline said. “Imagine the panic that would cause. Could you pass the milk, Adam?”

Pretty amazing to consider how different war was then.
Rating: 8.5/10

Published by NYLA

Shadows of the Heart (1996)

Shores of DesireThis is another boinking book that is an excellent mystery.

Set in England in 1817.

Paul Lescaut is the unrecognized bastard son of a French Marquis, Daniel de Ribard, and his childhood wish was for revenge. Unfortunately, as we see in the prologue, his revenge was not what he was expecting, and his guilt has followed him into adulthood.

When he interrupts the murder of a young woman, he then takes on the responsibility for her safety, however, the loss of her memory makes keeping her safe extremely difficult.

There is so very much I love about this.

First, the heroine is pregnant. I was very curious as to how the romance was going to work out.

Second, the mystery is again very complicated and very good.

Third, I really like Paul. He thinks he’s a terrible person, but he isn’t.

Robert joined the army because he wanted to change the world. I joined because I wanted to go out and smash things.

Also, I love Paul’s interactions with Dugal, the young pick-pocket he ends up working with while on the run. Dugal isn’t just a plot moppet, he’s a central and well-developed character.

“France.” Dugal bounced on the chair arm. “We’re going to see the Froggies.”

Amy folded her hands primly. “You won’t like it there. You won’t understand what people are saying.”

“I don’t understand what they’re saying in England half the time.

I loved this bit, where an English soldier must deal with sheep.

Wilkins stared at the flock. At the other huts they’d searched, the sheep had been grazing farther afield. But the day was closing and the shepherd must have gathered them in to count. Close up, looming in the mist, the animals looked larger than Wilkins would have thought. There was something menacing about their black faces. The rams had nasty-looking horns.

Eager to be gone, Wilkins tramped out of the hut. The shepherd boy scowled at him. The sheep were bleating and stirring in what Wilkins thought was a menacing manner.

MENACING SHEEP. (Yes, I know that’s actually not unrealistic as sheep are large and any group of large animals can be a threat, but it’s still hilarious.)

I also liked another bit, where the female character is confronted with a dead body.

“Cold she’s growing.” She set the hand down carefully and passed her own over (dead person’s) face, closing the staring eyes. “It’s not decent else.”

“I was afraid to touch her,” Sophie said.

“You needn’t be. She’s naught but dead now. We all come to it in the end.”

I liked both the compassion and acceptance in that. (Of course an older woman living her live in poverty would be unafraid of death, since she’d have dealt with it her entire life.)

I really liked this book, and highly recommend it (even with the boinking).
Rating: 9/10

Published by NYLA

Re-Read: January 2016

Set in Scotland, July 1817

The third book in the series (yes, I did skip the first book on this re-read, but may read it last) is about Robert Lescaut’s cousin Paul, who is the unacknowledged bastard son of the Marquis de Ribard.

Paul manages to rescue a woman from being killed in an alley, but when he discovers who the attempted murderer was, he knows he has to flee, even though the woman wakes with no idea who she is.

Only a woman accustomed to servants would have so many tiny fastenings on the back of her dress.

And the dialogue between Paul and Fenella is marvelous.

“Are you all right?”

“Considering I’m with child, I don’t know who I am, and I’ve been lying facedown in a flock of sheep?”

I also loved the couple who came to the rescue of Paul and Fenella.

I know how peevish you get when you haven’t dined.”

“Peevish? I’m never peevish.”

“Of course not,” Lady Margaret said, contradicting herself with practiced ease.

“That’s my coat and breeches you’re wearing,” Sir James said.

“I’m much indebted to you, sir. Your wife said you no longer wore them.”

“I don’t, eh?” Sir James patted the solid paunch round his midsection. “Well, I daresay she’s right.

Sir James and Lady Margaret are wonderful–a couple who had an arranged marriage, but are quite obviously very fond of each other–perhaps even in love. It was a lovely contrast to way the ton lived–almost looking down upon love and fidelity.

Do you have children, Somerset?”

“No. I’m not so fortunate as to be married yet.”

Sir James clapped him on the back. “No need for that to stop you.”

One of the things I like about Tracy Grant’s books are that the main character are aware (or are made aware) of how those who are not better off live.

“Did you hear what she said about her aunt not being able to pay the funeral society? They have to scrape pennies to ensure their children have a decent burial if they die.”

And I’ll note again the lovely passage, how the poor were quite matter-of-fact about death.

Throwing off Sophie’s arm, she moved to the murdered woman and lifted her hand. “Cold she’s growing.” She set the hand down carefully and passed her own over Mrs. Burden’s face, closing the staring eyes. “It’s not decent else.”

“I was afraid to touch her,” Sophie said.

“You needn’t be. She’s naught but dead now. We all come to it in the end.”

It’s a lovely story.
Rating: 8.5/10

Rightfully His (1998)

Rightfully-HisThe conclusion to the Lescaut Quartet. This is a historical mystery with boinking. But not tons of boinking.

Set in England in 1812-1813

This book was set up at the end of the last book, but you shouldn’t need to read the previous books in the series. Of course, reading this book will destroy some of the surprises and mystery of the previous books, so you should really read at least the previous book first. Charlotte “Charlie” de Ribard walked away from her family after her father ordered the death of her cousin and her bastard step-brother.

Francis Storbridge was secretary to Daniel de Ribard, but went on to a very good marriage and a seat in Parliament. He is now a widower with a young daughter, and he is also the guardian of his wife’s younger siblings–quite a handful for a single man.

He has also been in love with Charlie since he was secretary to her father, and proposes a deal.

“You expect me to believe you want to marry me so you’ll have a chaperone for your wards?”

He shrugged his elegantly disheveled shoulders. “As my wife you could hardly give me two weeks’ notice.”

Frank is also an advocate for the abolishing of slavery.

I don’t mean to sound a horrid idiot, but I thought slavery had been abolished while I was still in the schoolroom.”

Frank pulled a straight-back chair away from the table and seated himself. “The slave trade was abolished. That didn’t emancipate the slaves already held in our colonies.”

I actually quite liked the inclusion of these historical bits in the story, because one of the things I like about historicals is the chance to get a glimpse into what life was like at the time. I’ve read several historicals with bluestockings, but very few that discuss the slavery.

“We certainly believe it wise to improve the condition of the slave population and to prepare them for eventual participation in civil rights and privileges.”

“Prepare?” Frank was on his feet again. “What sort of preparations does one need to be treated as a human being?”

In case you can’t tell, I really liked that part of the story.

I also liked the complicated relationship between Frank and Charlie. She wants to dislike him, to hate him for the bargain they made, but the more she discovers, the harder it is to dislike him. But don’t think Frank is a saint (he doesn’t claim to be one) and I enjoy those discoveries just as much as the ones that put him in a good light.

In all, I really enjoyed this.
Rating: 8.5/10

Published by NYLA

Re-Read: January 2016

Set in London, December 1822

The final book in the Lescaut Quartet picks up the story of Charlotte, the daughter of Daniel, the Marquis de Ribard, and the man who had been his secretary, Francis Storbridge, who had been in love with Charlie since he first laid eyes on her.

I’ll admit that I dislike the title of this book. I understand it, but I don’t care for it.

Luckily, the “His” of the title is a decent man. After his wife died in childbirth and her father himself died, he took on her siblings, caring for them, despite the hostility of the older boys.

Frank set down his wineglass. “You’ve forgot the first lesson of dining in polite society, Serena.”

Serena wrinkled her nose. “Never say what you’re really thinking?”

“Precisely.”

There is, as in the previous books, a good deal of intrigue and mystery, to even out the boinking.
Rating: 8/10

 

Romance

 

Widow’s Gambit (1998)

Widows-GambitThe Neville girls are of good family, but impoverished, and after their father’s death are left to make their way as best they can.

Claudia is the most beautiful (and Diana is not yet of age) so Livia decides to do whatever it takes to give Claudia a Season, and a chance to find a husband.

Diana said she wanted to go to London as much as her sisters did. If Livia had to acquire a dead husband to get them there, she had no fault to find with the scheme.

We have three sisters, two young men at Oxford who support their plan, an older brother and various aunts of said young man, and two younger children, both of whom have lost their mothers.

And some various other nephews and aunts and sisters-in-law.

And a butler who is an out-of-work actor.

There are a lot of characters in this book, but for the most part they are all unique personalities,

Aunt Isabel claims that one can deny anything and be believed if one does it with enough authority.

Nicholas has been sitting in the House for years and I guess he’s got used to it, though I’ve never understood why he likes it, it seems to make him angry so much of the time…

In addition to a lot of characters, there is a lot going on. Claudia needs to find a husband, Nicholas needs a wife, Francesca needs to remarry if Nicholas is going to take a wife, and many many other things.

Oddly, however, it didn’t get too muddled, and it was amusing. It wasn’t one of the best historical romances I’ve read–and certainly not up to what I’ve come to expect from Tracy Grant, but this is an older book, and you can see the kernel of the writer she’ll become in there.

If you’ve read other Tracy Grant stories, be aware this is an early work, but it is fun.
Rating: 7/10

Published by NYLA